In 2013, CNN was among the news outlets reporting that veterans were experiencing delayed care at the Williams Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans Medical Center in Columbia, SC. In fact, the delays were so serious that six veterans died while waiting for months to receive necessary diagnostic procedures. The VA launched an investigation into the GI clinic at Dorn and found several issues, including low staff census; leadership turnover that resulted in a lack of understanding of roles, responsibilities and system processes; and ineffective program coordination. Allegations of long wait times also emerged from VA facilities in Arizona, Pittsburgh, and the Phoenix VA Health Care System. Delays, however, were not the only shortcomings alleged. In the Phoenix VA Health Care System, for instance, there were claims of manipulated patient wait times, bad scheduling practices, and patient deaths. In 2014, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) launched an investigation into these allegations. Two questions were addressed in this review:

Evaluate the impact of leadership on employee motivation, productivity and job
satisfaction.
Ethics and Decision-Making in the VA Healthcare System
Case Study: Problems at the VA Health System
In 2009, President Barack Obama appointed retired Army Chief of Staff, General Eric
Shinseki, to the position of secretary of Veterans Affairs (VA), the federal department
responsible for providing healthcare and federal benefits to U.S. veterans and
dependents. As part of its strategic plan, Secretary Shinseki was tasked with
implementing 16 major initiatives to bring the VA into the 21st century. One of the 16
initiatives was the enhancement of the veteran’s experience with and access to
healthcare.
In 2013, CNN was among the news outlets reporting that veterans were experiencing
delayed care at the Williams Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans Medical Center in
Columbia, SC. In fact, the delays were so serious that six veterans died while waiting for
months to receive necessary diagnostic procedures. The VA launched an investigation
into the GI clinic at Dorn and found several issues, including low staff census;
leadership turnover that resulted in a lack of understanding of roles, responsibilities and
system processes; and ineffective program coordination. Allegations of long wait times
also emerged from VA facilities in Arizona, Pittsburgh, and the Phoenix VA Health Care
System. Delays, however, were not the only shortcomings alleged. In the Phoenix VA
Health Care System, for instance, there were claims of manipulated patient wait times,
bad scheduling practices, and patient deaths.
In 2014, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) launched an investigation into these
allegations. Two questions were addressed in this review:

  1. Did the facility’s electronic wait list (EWL) purposely omit the names of veterans
    waiting for care and, if so, at whose direction?
  2. Were the deaths of any of these veterans related to delays in care?
    The investigators confirmed “inappropriate scheduling issues throughout the VA and
    health care system”
    (VA 2014, iii).
    In the Phoenix VA, specifically, investigators found that 1,400 veterans did not have a
    primary care appointment but were listed on the EWL. It was also determined that 1,700
    veterans were waiting for a primary care appointment but were not listed on the EWL.
    Because veterans were not on the EWL system, the

Phoenix leadership significantly understated the time new patients waited for the
appointments. The investigators found that the average wait time was 115 days for the
first primary care appointment and about
84 percent of these patients waited more than 14 days.
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) identified multiple types of scheduling practices
that were not in compliance with Veterans Health Administration policy. Since the
multiple lists found were something other than the official EWL, the additional lists may
be the basis for allegations of “secret” wait lists.
Secretary Shinseki called the findings “reprehensible” and resigned from his post on
May 30, 2014.
Case Study Questions

  1. From a leadership perspective, analyze three problems at the VA relative to
    ethical decision-making practices.
  2. Discuss the ethical issue of having 1,700 veterans, who were not listed on the
    EWL, wait for a primary care appointment at the Phoenix VA. Create at least
    three (3) policies/standards to ensure ethical leadership practices with respect to
    improving coordination of the EWL and primary care appointments.
  3. Explain why Secretary Eric Shinseki resigned his position. Identify at least three
    (3) alternative options that Secretary Shinseki could have taken to resolve the
    unethical decision-making practices in this case study.
  4. Apply two (2) examples of American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE)
    Code of Ethics to the VA Health System case study.
    Minimum Submission Requirements
     This Assessment should be a Microsoft Word (minimum 1000 words) document,
    in addition to the title and reference pages.
     Respond to the questions in a thorough manner, providing specific examples of
    concepts, topics, definitions, and other elements asked for in the questions. Your
    submission should be highly organized, logical, and focused.
     Your submission must be written in Standard English and demonstrate
    exceptional content, organization, style, and grammar and mechanics.
     Your submission should provide a clearly established and sustained viewpoint
    and purpose.
     Your writing should be well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and
    insightful.
     A separate page at the end of your submission should contain a list of
    references, in APA format. Use your textbook, the Library, and the internet for
    research.

 Be sure to cite both in-text and reference list citations where appropriate and
reference all sources. Your sources and content should follow proper APA
citation style. Review the writing resources for APA formatting and citation found
in Academic Tools. Additional writing resources can be found within the
Academic Success Center.
 Your submission should:
o include a cover sheet;
o be double-spaced;
o be typed in Times New Roman, 12 -point font;
o include correct citations
o be written in Standard English with no spelling or punctuation errors; and
o include correct references at the bottom of the last page.
o quoting should be less than 10% of the entire paper. Paraphrasing

Needs help with your Homework? ORDER NOW

How Our Website Works

1. FILL IN OUR SIMPLE ORDER FORM

It has never been easier to place your order. Fill in the initial requirements in the small order form located on the home page and press “continue” button to proceed to the main order form or press “order” button in the header menu. Starting from there let our system intuitively guide you through all steps of ordering process.

2. PROCEED WITH THE PAYMENT

All your payments are processed securely through PayPal. This enables us to guarantee a 100% security of your funds and process payments swiftly.

3. WRITER ASSIGNMENT

Next, we match up your order details with the most qualified freelance writer in your field.

4. WRITING PROCESS

Once we have found the most suitable writer for your assignment, they start working on a masterpiece just for you!

5. DELIVERY

Once finished, your final paper will be available for download through your personal dashboard. You will also receive an email notification with a copy of your paper attached to it. Sometimes, the writer may leave a note for you about the order in case there is any additional information that they need to give you.

How Our Website Works

1. FILL IN OUR SIMPLE ORDER FORM

It has never been easier to place your order. Fill in the initial requirements in the small order form located on the home page and press “continue” button to proceed to the main order form or press “order” button in the header menu. Starting from there let our system intuitively guide you through all steps of ordering process.

2. PROCEED WITH THE PAYMENT

All your payments are processed securely through PayPal. This enables us to guarantee a 100% security of your funds and process payments swiftly.

3. WRITER ASSIGNMENT

Next, we match up your order details with the most qualified freelance writer in your field.

4. WRITING PROCESS

Once we have found the most suitable writer for your assignment, they start working on a masterpiece just for you!

5. DELIVERY

Once finished, your final paper will be available for download through your personal dashboard. You will also receive an email notification with a copy of your paper attached to it. Sometimes, the writer may leave a note for you about the order in case there is any additional information that they need to give you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.