Post PHL203 Unit 4 QuestionThe requirements for this question are to:Create a thesis statement w

Post PHL203 Unit 4 AssignmentThe requirements for this assignment are to:Create a thesis statement with three reasons that underlie your thesis.Write a 5 paragraph essay that encompasses and explains your thesis statement, and your three supporting reasons.Begin to think about how this paper will be transformed into your final paper.Students: Be sure to read the criteria, by which your paper/project will be evaluated, before you write, and again after you write. Refer to the rubric document in Course Information.For this assignment you will choose one of the applied ethics topics that we will be covering in this course (sexual ethics, abortion, capital punishment, war & terrorism, and animal rights) or any other ethical topic that interests you, and begin to write the framework for your final paper. The framework will consist of 5 paragraphs; an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a final paragraph.Paragraph 1:In the first paragraph you should provide a brief introduction to the issue that allows the reader to understand the topic and where you will be going with the discussion. The first paragraph should contain a one sentence thesis statement. A thesis statement should contain your moral contention and three reasons why you hold that view. For examples of what is expected, please see the Thesis Statement Guide above in Readings and Resources. Your thesis should resemble example number 3 or 4 in the guide. The thesis statement is a very important aspect of this assignment and will constitute a good portion of the grade.Paragraphs 2, 3, and 4:Here you will explain the three reasons why you hold the ethical or moral opinion that you do. These paragraphs should encompass the body of your essay, and will contain one reason per paragraph. Each paragraph should start by stating the reason that you will discuss and then explain that reason in further detail using any sources, data, or examples that are pertinent to backing up your opinion with facts.Paragraph 5:Conclude your essay by very briefly reviewing the three reasons that you have used to demonstrate the strength of your opinion and why they show the issue is ethically significant. Your final paragraph should also contain a paraphrased restatement of your thesis.This assignment is the first part of a three part process that will lead to a completed final essay in unit 8. The second element of this assignment will come in units 5, 6, and 7 and will require you to analyze your ethical question using three of the ethical theories we have discussed in the course, and choose which system you believe works best to back up your initial thesis statement from unit 4. Please go ahead and read the instructions for the Final Paper before starting this project. The third element will be completing the final paper in unit 8. The Final Paper will be five to seven pages, so please keep that in mind when developing your topic. You must choose a topic that you can cover adequately within the required page length. After you choose a topic, go to the unit that corresponds to your topic choice and begin to use the resources in those weeks to gather information for your paper.The Unit 1 thesis statement paper must be 375 to 500 words in length (excluding title and reference pages), double spaced, and formatted according to APA style, using Times new Roman type and size 12 Font. You must use at least two scholarly resources to support your claims. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page. For information regarding APA, please visit this tutorial from the American Psychological Association or refer to the Post University APA Style Guide.Please use this Thesis Statement Guide – for help with your Unit 4 Written AssignmentRefer to the rubric document in Course Information before submitting.Post PHL203 Unit 5 AssignmentAssignments submitted through this link will be checked using SafeAssign by Blackboard. Your work will not be used for any purpose other than preventing plagiarism in the University. Ownership of the intellectual property contained in your written work will not be transferred to any third party. Please submit your paper as a Word Document. If you have the 2010 version of Word, please save your paper in a previous version (Word 97-2003 document) as Safe Assign may not accept the most recent version.The requirements for this assignment are to:Examine your thesis statement using one or two particular sub-types of deontological ethics.Write a 5-6 paragraph essay that encompasses and explains how deontologists would generally view your topic, your thesis statement, and your three supporting reasons.Remain cognizant of how this essay will fit into your final paper.Students: Be sure to read the criteria, by which your paper/project will be evaluated, before you write, and again after you write. Refer to the rubric document in Course Information.This Unit you will write an essay examining your chosen topic and thesis statement through the eyes of an ethical deontologist. More specifically you will choose a particular sub-type of deontologist ethics (Contractarianism of Rawls, Kantian theory, natural law, or libertarian ethics) to focus on in your essay. You must discuss the various strengths and weaknesses of the sub-type and how those who adhere to that system address the ethical issue you chose. This will require using the readings that are in the unit that corresponds to your topic, the readings on deontological ethics, and outside research that you conduct on your own. The paper should follow the structure outlined below:Introduction: Your introductory paragraph must include your thesis statement and explain that you will be examining your topic through the eyes of a deontological ethicist. You must also list the various sub-types of deontological ethics that you will be examining in the body of this paper (generally, one to two sub-types is enough).Body: The body of the paper should be broken up into three paragraphs:Application: The first paragraph or two in the body should apply deontological ethical theory to your topic, and more specifically you must examine your particular chosen deontological sub-type and how it connects to your topic and thesis statement. In this paragraph you should cite deontological scholars and how they view your topic.Strengths: In the next paragraph of the body of your paper you must show the strengths of your chosen deontological theory in relation to your topic, and the ways that you think this moral theory might work well with the thesis statement you are arguing.Weaknesses: In the last paragraph of the body of your paper, you must examine the weaknesses of your chosen deontological theory in relation to your topic and the ways that you think this moral theory might not work well with the thesis statement you are arguing.Conclusion: This should be one paragraph. The conclusion should very briefly review the main points of your essay and must contain a paraphrased restatement of your thesis.The Unit 5 paper must be 375 to 500 words in length (excluding title and reference pages), double spaced, and formatted according to APA style, using Times new Roman type and size 12 Font. You must use at least two scholarly resources to support your claims. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page. For information regarding APA, please visit this tutorial from the American Psychological Association or refer to the Post University APA Style Guide.Post PHL203 Unit 6 AssignmentAssignments submitted through this link will be checked using SafeAssign by Blackboard. Your work will not be used for any purpose other than preventing plagiarism in the University. Ownership of the intellectual property contained in your written work will not be transferred to any third party. Please submit your paper as a Word Document. If you have the 2010 version of Word, please save your paper in a previous version (Word 97-2003 document) as Safe Assign may not accept the most recent version.The requirements for this assignment are to:Examine your thesis statement using one or two particular sub-types of consequentialist ethics.Write a 5-6 paragraph essay that encompasses and explains how consequentialist ethicists in your chosen sub-type would generally view your topic, your thesis statement, and your three supporting reasons.Remain cognizant of how this essay will fit into your final paper.Students: Be sure to read the criteria, by which your paper/project will be evaluated, before you write, and again after you write. Refer to the rubric document in Course Information.This Unit you will write an essay examining your chosen topic and thesis statement through the eyes of an ethical consequentialist. More specifically you will choose a particular sub-type of consequentialism (Act, Rule, or Preference utilitarianism) to focus on in your essay. You must discuss the various strengths and weaknesses of the sub-type and how those who adhere to that system address the ethical issue you chose. This will require using the readings that are in the unit that corresponds to your topic, the readings on consequentialist ethics, and outside research that you conduct on your own. The paper should follow the structure outlined below:Introduction: Your introductory paragraph must include your thesis statement and explain that you will be examining your topic through the eyes of a consequentialist ethicist. You must also list the various sub-types of consequentialist ethics that you will be examining in the body of this paper (generally, one to two sub-types is enough).Body: The body of the paper should be broken up into three paragraphs.Application: The first paragraph or two in the body should apply consequentialist ethical theory to your topic, and more specifically you must examine your particular chosen consequentialist (utilitarian) sub-type and how it connects to your topic and thesis statement. In this paragraph you should cite utilitarian scholars and how they view your topic.Strengths: In the next paragraph of the body of your paper you must show the strengths of your chosen utilitarian theory in relation to your topic, and the ways that you think this moral theory might work well with the thesis statement you are arguing.Weaknesses: In the last paragraph of the body of your paper, you must examine the weaknesses of your chosen utilitarian theory in relation to your topic and the ways that you think this moral theory might not work well with the thesis statement you are arguing.Conclusion: This should be one paragraph. The conclusion should very briefly review the main points of your essay and must contain a paraphrased restatement of your thesis.The Unit 6 paper must be 375 to 500 words in length (excluding title and reference pages), double spaced, and formatted according to APA style, using Times new Roman type and size 12 Font. You must use at least two scholarly resources to support this essay. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page. For information regarding APA, please visit this tutorial from the American Psychological Association or refer to the Post University APA Style Guide.Post PHL203 Unit 7 AssignmentAssignments submitted through this link will be checked
using SafeAssign by Blackboard. Your work will not be used for any purpose
other than preventing plagiarism in the University. Ownership of the
intellectual property contained in your written work will not be transferred to
any third party. Please submit your paper as a Word Document. If you have the
2010 version of Word, please save your paper in a previous version (Word
97-2003 document) as Safe Assign may not accept the most recent version.

The requirements for this assignment are to:
Examine your thesis statement using one or two particular
sub-types of Character based ethics.
Write a 5-6 paragraph essay that encompasses and explains
how character based ethicists in your chosen sub-type would generally view your
topic, your thesis statement, and your three supporting reasons.
Remain cognizant of how this essay will fit into your final
paper.
Students: Be sure to
read the criteria, by which your paper/project will be evaluated, before you
write, and again after you write. Refer
to the rubric document in Course Information.
This Unit you will write an essay examining your chosen
topic and thesis statement through the eyes of a character based ethicist. More specifically you will choose a particular
sub-type of Character based ethics (ethics of care, and virtue ethics) to focus
on in your essay. You must discuss the various strengths and weaknesses of the
sub-type and how those who adhere to that system address the ethical issue you
chose. This will require using the readings that are in the unit that
corresponds to your topic, the readings on character based ethics, and outside
research that you conduct on your own. The paper should follow the structure
outlined below:
Introduction: Your
introductory paragraph must include your thesis statement and explain that you
will be examining your topic through the eyes of a character based
ethicist. You must also list the various
sub-types of character ethics that you will be examining in the body of this
paper (generally, one to two sub-types is enough).
Body: The body of the
paper should be broken up into three paragraphs.
Application: The first paragraph or two in the body should
apply character based ethical theory to your topic, and more specifically you
must examine your particular chosen character ethics sub-type and how it
connects to your topic and thesis statement. In this paragraph you should cite
virtue ethics or ethics of care scholars and how they view your topic.
Strengths: In the next paragraph of the body of your paper
you must show the strengths of your chosen character ethics theory in relation
to your topic, and the ways that you think this moral theory might work well
with the thesis statement you are arguing.
Weaknesses: In the last paragraph of the body of your paper,
you must examine the weaknesses of your chosen character ethics theory in
relation to your topic and the ways that you think this moral theory might not
work well with the thesis statement you are arguing.
Conclusion: This
should be one paragraph. The conclusion should very briefly review the main
points of your essay and must contain a paraphrased restatement of your thesis.
The Unit 6 paper must be 375 to 500 words in length
(excluding title and reference pages), double spaced, and formatted according
to APA style, using Times new Roman type and size 12 Font. You must use at
least two scholarly resources to support this essay. Cite your sources within
the text of your paper and on the reference page. For information regarding
APA, please visit this tutorial from the American Psychological Association or
refer to the Post University APA Style Guide.